|
DU claims it does not artificially feed ducks, yet I have heard that DU private lands
conservation programs provide incentives to farmers to allow portions of grain
crops to go unharvested to benefit migrating waterfowl.
This is not correct. DU does offer incentives to landowners to
develop waterfowl habitat in priority conservation regions like the MAV and
Gulf Coast where the best available scientific information and modeling tell us
there are foraging habitat shortfalls (i.e., potentially more birds than there is
food available to feed them).
Typically, DU will provide a water control structure and require the
landowner to pick up, deliver and install the structure to flood agricultural
fields, or preferably, set aside areas too wet for traditional crops that tend
to produce moist soil plants that provide natural foods to ducks. In exchange for this structure, DU requires
that the landowner flood his fields or moist soil area for a predetermined
period, and flooding is typically rainfall dependent (lack of winter rainfall
is not typically an issue in the MAV).
In the MAV, this is from November 15 or as soon after harvest as
possible if it is a rice, soybean milo, or corn field, until March 1. There is absolutely no requirement
that any portion of the crop remain unharvested. Farmers operate agribusinesses, and most dont have the
luxury of leaving crops unharvested to benefit waterfowl. After all, the harvest is what generates
their annual income.
Further it is not necessary to
leave standing grain to attract ducks.
The ducks, DU, and our conservation partners know that harvested crop
fields typically have sufficient waste grain (grain that is lost during normal
mechanical harvest operations) that can provide food to migrating and wintering
birds. It is more attractive to ducks
when it is shallowly flooded, though ducks do frequently feed in dry fields in
some areas. Landowners do have the
option to leave standing grain if they so choose, but there is no requirement
to leave any portion of the crop unharvested.
DU only requires that they close the structure to hold water during the
periods specified by agreements.
Farmers get other benefits from
winter flooding, , including erosion control, better soil tilthe, no winter
weed green-up for areas under water, reductions in weed seeds (as ducks remove
the weed seeds in addition to waste grain), retention of soil nutrients and
other benefits. DU views this as a
win-win situation, as benefits go to the ducks (foraging habitat), the farmers,
and the landscapes within which these farms occur through improvements to water
quality. Ultimately, while the programs
initially were conceived to restore foraging habitat in severely altered
landscapes, the programs increasingly are becoming Best Management Practices
that contribute toward sustainable land use practices of benefit to wildlife,
fisheries, water quality, and people who depend upon these systems for
livelihoods and/or recreational benefits.
|
|

Conservation Planning FAQs
How can DU blame only the weather for "our" poor season when it also spends big money on winter projects that are, by definition, designed to provide habitat for migrating ducks in flyway states?
...Answer
DU claims it does not artificially feed ducks, yet I have heard that DU private lands conservation programs provide incentives to farmers to allow portions of grain crops to go unharvested to benefit migrating waterfowl. Is this true?
...Answer
Exactly what do DU's private lands conservation programs allow and why?
...Answer
What is the exact purpose of winter habitat projects?
...Answer
Do the projects in the MAV and Gulf Coast conservation regions get used by ducks every year?
...Answer
I heard that DU and the USFWS were dumping corn or other grain on refuges to hold birds north after the northern states closed their seasons to keep southern hunters from getting to kill too many birds. Is this true?
...Answer
What percentage of the money raised by DU in a given state remains in the state, and how much is spent in "other states"?
...Answer
|